Unclessify
Unclessify
Language
SEC Rescinds Policy Regarding Denials of Settlements in Enforcement Actions
SEC

SEC Rescinds Policy Regarding Denials of Settlements in Enforcement Actions

SECUnited States2026declassified
#sec#enforcement#settlements#financial crime#document#investigation#declassified

Source: SECUnited States

Go to original source
Share:

Legal Notice

This content was published by SEC. All rights, responsibilities and accuracy of the information are the exclusive competence of SEC. Unclessify only indexes and makes declassified content accessible.

Read Full Disclaimer →

Document Content

SEC Rescinds Policy Regarding Denials of Settlements in Enforcement Actions

More in this Section

SEC Rescinds Policy Regarding Denials of Settlements in Enforcement Actions

SEC Rescinds Policy Regarding Denials of Settlements in Enforcement Actions

The Securities and Exchange Commission today rescinded a policy, codified in Rule 202.5(e) of its informal rules of procedures, stating that when it chooses to settle an enforcement action in which a sanction is imposed, it will not settle unless the defendant or respondent also agrees not to publicly deny the allegations in the complaint or administrative order. Rescinding Rule 202.5(e) aligns the Commission with the overwhelming majority of federal agencies that do not have a similar rule and gives the Commission more flexibility in settling enforcement actions, which conserves resources, provides certainty, and potentially expedites the return of money to injured investors. The rescission recognizes that the effect on the public interest from such denials may be minimal and that the policy itself may have created an incorrect impression that the Commission is trying to shield itself from criticism.

“For more than 50 years, the Commission has conditioned settlement on a defendant’s promise not to publicly deny the Commission’s allegations. I am pleased that we are rescinding the no-deny policy today,” said SEC Chairman Paul S. Atkins. “Speech critical of the government is an important part of the American tradition. This rescission ends the policy prohibiting such criticism by settling defendants.”

There is no known instance of the Commission seeking to reopen an administrative or civil proceeding as a consequence of a defendant or respondent violating a no-deny provision to which they have consented.

In light of the rescission of Rule 202.5(e), the Commission will not enforce existing no-deny provisions that have already been entered. In the event of a breach of an existing no-deny provision, the Commission will take no action to ask a district court to vacate a settlement (or to reopen an adjudicatory proceeding) in connection with the terms of the settlement agreement.

The Commission generally does not require settling defendants to admit to allegations. Today’s rescission does not affect the Commission’s practice related to admissions in settlements and does not affect the Commission’s discretion to settle with defendants who decline to admit facts or liability or its discretion to negotiate for admissions as part of a settlement.

Last Reviewed or Updated: May 19, 2026

Resources

Related content

Click to switch theme:

Words

[object Object]

Comments (0)